« March 2004 | Main | May 2004 »

April 2004

Thursday, April 29, 2004

Kerry Campaign's Diversity Challenged

The Associated Press reports that some black officials and independent analysts are concerned that there is a lack of minority representation in the Kerry campaign.

According to the Associated Press:

A lack of minority representation at the upper levels of John Kerry's presidential campaign threatens to weaken enthusiasm among black and Hispanic voters, two core constituencies, some Democrats and advocacy groups say.

Kerry's inner circle - the dozen or so advisers who participate in the campaign's most important decisions - is mostly white.

[. . .]

Some black officials and independent analysts expressed concerned about the campaign's lack of racial diversity. Campaign officials and the leader of the Congressional Black Caucus said the criticism was unfounded.

"I am concerned about diversity, but more importantly I am concerned about the experience in that diversity - senior policy people who know people from one end of the country to the other," said Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Ill., a caucus member.

He said the issue may dampen voter enthusiasm. "The senator should remedy this very quickly," Jackson said.

Added Ron Walters, who worked on the presidential campaigns of Jesse Jackson Sr. and runs the African-American Leadership Institute at the University of Maryland: "There is a sense that Kerry's people don't get it."

Campaign officials dispute the criticism, saying too much of the focus has been on the influence of Shrum, Devine and other consultants.

The Associated Press Article comes less than a week after Washington Post columnist Colbert I. King asked "Is Kerry's Campaign Colorblind?" King's question resulted from Carlos Watson's April 20, 2004 "The Inside Edge" column on CNN.com.

According to King:

The Massachusetts senator, putative 2004 Democratic standard-bearer and soon-to-be leader of the party that most voting African Americans and other people of color call home, has an innermost circle of advisers that is practically as white as the driven snow. That slam against the Kerry high command appeared last week in "The Inside Edge" column of Carlos Watson on CNN.com.

Not wanting to believe that Kerry would assemble a team of insiders with faces that exclusively resembled Europe -- especially after proclaiming throughout the length and breadth of the land that he wants our workplaces to reflect the full face of America -- I called the Kerry campaign in Washington and got press spokesperson Stephanie Cutter on the phone.

I asked her: Is Carlos Watson's assertion true?

Watson, for the record, had written that, unlike former vice president Al Gore, who had an African American campaign manager, political director and finance director, Kerry has no person of color in his inner circle, including the campaign manager, campaign chairperson, media adviser, policy director, foreign policy adviser, general election manager, convention planner, national finance chairman and head of the vice presidential search team.

Cutter's answer to my question was truly Clintonesque. It all depends, she said, on what you mean by inner circle.

[. . .]

Let's be fair, you might argue. Doesn't Kerry have a right to surround himself with close friends and top assistants who click with him? Of course. But is it too much to expect that the Democratic Party's top liberal, the candidate who cries that he has "fought for civil rights and equal opportunity for every American my whole life," who brags about his efforts to "enhance diversity," and whose message is inclusiveness, would in fact have a presidential campaign inner circle that is reflective of the diversity of his party and the country? And if elected, will Kerry govern that way?

Watson's introductory paragraphs sum it up:

While Democrats have long claimed to be the party of greater inclusiveness, this year President Bush may argue that his administration is more diverse at senior levels than John Kerry's would be.

Seizing on the nation's diversity -- the country is almost one-third non-white -- Bush has appointed African-Americans, Asians, Latinos and women to senior and non-stereotypical roles: Secretary of State, national security adviser, Transportation Secretary, White House Counsel.

I can imagine the hullabaloo in the press if President Bush had failed to appoint such a diverse group of advisors and Kerry did have a diverse cadre of campaign advisors.

Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters , has also blogged about Kerry's diversity failure and posts that if the Kerry campaign was a corporate boardroom instead of a Democratic presidential campaign, Jesse Jackson would demand a plan to fill key roles with people of color.

UPDATE: The New York Times has picked up the Kerry campaign lacks diversity meme. The Times reports that last week, more than a dozen minority elected officials and political strategists expressed concern about the lack of diversity in Kerry's inner circle:

"The reality is that we're entering May and the Kerry campaign has no message out there to the Hispanic community nor has there been any inkling of any reach-out effort in any state to the Hispanic electorate, at least with any perceivable sustainable strategy in mind," Alvaro Cifuentes, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee's Hispanic Caucus, said in an e-mail message to party leaders provided by a recipient who insisted on anonymity. "It is no secret that the word of mouth in the Beltway and beyond is not that he does not get it, it is that he does not care."

Separately, in a letter addressed to Mr. Kerry, Raul Yzaguirre, the president of the National Council of La Raza, denounced the "remarkable and unacceptable absence of Latinos in your campaign."

"Relegating all of your minority staff to the important but limited role of outreach only reinforces perceptions that your campaign views Hispanics as a voting constituency to be mobilized, but not as experts to be consulted in shaping policy," wrote Mr. Yzaguirre, whose group is among the oldest, largest and most influential representing Hispanics.

While Mr. Kerry, whose home state, Massachusetts, is 7 percent Hispanic and 5 percent black, has active support from black members of Congress, some veteran African-American leaders have struggled to find a foothold in his campaign. Even some black officials who called a reporter to offer their perspective at the campaign's behest said Mr. Kerry had work to do.

"He is generally surrounded by white folks, and sure that concerns me, sure," said Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina.

According to the Times the lack of diversity meme started with a newspaper article in which Kerry's campaign manager, Mary Beth Cahill, identified five white men as Kerry's closest advisers, and an announcement of new staff members in which only a handful of the 30 staffers were black and Hispanic.

"If there would have been a senior person at that table they would have said, `Don't even put out that press release until you can put some Hispanics on it,' " Armando Gutierrez, a New Mexico media consultant, said of the first release. Of the second, he said, "It's so pigeon-holed, it just sounds patronizing and condescending."

After weeks of masquerading as a party behind its standard bearer, the Democrats are beginning to act like Democrats.

Julie Anne Fidler at Pardon My English has posted an entry about this issue getting it just about right:

Kerry is deliberately overlooking qualified Blacks who could efficiently run his campaign, then that’s another crime of equal or greater depth. But as much as I disdain John Kerry, I doubt that is the case.

[...]

And I think I’d have more respect for him if he stepped up to the mic and said, “If I find Blacks and Hispanics who are fully qualified to run this election, I will hire them as needed. Otherwise, I’m happy with my staff and don’t believe they should be judged negatively for being white.”

Well said.

Democrats Concerned About Kerry's Message

Some Democrats are concerned about John Kerry's slow development of a coherent message. Reuters reports:

At a time when he could be laying out the grand themes for his November battle with President Bush, the presumptive Democratic nominee has been fighting skirmishes with Republican surrogates over his service in Vietnam, his votes on taxes and national security and his claims of support from foreign leaders.

Critics say Kerry, who sometimes focuses on nuance in a medium that values broad strokes and easy to digest labels, has fumbled early opportunities to define his vision for the future and make the case for his campaign.

"I have no idea what the Kerry message is. He has no positive message at this point," said Democratic consultant Doug Schoen, a former pollster for President Bill Clinton. "I know what his critique is of George Bush, but there has been a virtual absence of a Kerry message."

There is also concern about how easily Kerry gets thrown off message and lets the Republicans get under his skin:

And in the eight weeks since he clinched the nomination, Kerry has often been thrown off his daily message by aggressive Republican attacks on his 20-year voting record as a Massachusetts senator or on his decorated stint in Vietnam and later opposition to the war.

A three-day bus tour of battleground states to talk about jobs earlier this week turned into a running fight over whether he claimed in 1971 to have thrown back his five medals from Vietnam in protest of the war, or just his ribbons.

Last week Kerry was forced to release his military and medical records after Republicans accused him of double-talk on whether they were available for public view and a former commander questioned if he deserved his first of three Purple Hearts.


Kerry's Decorations

The Boston Globe summarizes Kerry's medals mystery.

Take 1:

Q. Did Kerry throw his combat decorations away in an antiwar protest 33 years ago?

A. Yes. As The Boston Globe reported on April 24, 1971, "John Kerry . . . said before he threw his medals over the fence: `I'm not doing this for any violent reasons, but for peace and justice, and to try to make this country wake up once and for all.' "

Take 2:

Q. Did Kerry throw his decorations away 33 years ago?

A. Yes. In a Nov. 6, 1971, interview with WRC-TV, he recalled that the protesters had decided to "renounce the symbols which this country gives . . . the medals themselves." When the interviewer asked, "How many did you give back, John?" he answered: "I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine." The interviewer noted that Kerry had won the Bronze and Silver Stars and three Purple Hearts. Kerry: "Well, and above that, I gave back my others."

Take 3:

Q. Did Kerry throw his decorations away 33 years ago?

A. No. In 1984, running for the Senate against a World War II Air Force veteran, he claimed he had refused to do so. "After showing a reporter his medals and ribbons on display in his Back Bay apartment," The Boston Globe reported on Oct. 15, 1984, Kerry "said he had disagreed with other protest leaders on throwing away medals." The medals he was seen tossing, Kerry added, were those of a "veteran from Lincoln [Mass.], at his request."

Take 4:

Q. Did Kerry throw his decorations away 33 years ago?

A. Medals, no; ribbons, yes. During his 1996 reelection campaign, he told the Globe that he only threw the ribbons pinned to his uniform. "Asked why he didn't bring his own medals to throw since it was planned weeks in advance," the Globe reported on Oct. 6, 1996, "Kerry said it was because he didn't have time to go home [to New York] and get them." The medals he was seen tossing, he claimed, belonged to two other veterans -- the one from Lincoln and one from New York. "Kerry says he can't remember their names."

The variations don't end there. For example, his explanation that he "didn't have time to go home and get" the medals -- i.e., he would have trashed them if he could have -- is sharply at odds with his earlier "explanation" to the Boston Herald: "They're my medals. I can do goddam what I want with them."

On Monday's TV show, after being shown the tape of his younger self claiming to have thrown "six, seven, eight, nine" medals onto the trash heap, Kerry heatedly insisted that he had pitched only his ribbons, not his medals. Then he insisted even more heatedly that "ribbons, medals were absolutely interchangeable. . . . there was no distinction . . . I think, to this day, there's no distinction between the two."

Well, if ribbons and medals are identical, then by his own admission he did throw away his medals. So why does he angrily maintain that he didn't?

I would add this passage from the last Friday's Los Angeles Times:

Kerry says he never claimed to have thrown the medals as his own. But as his reputation grew as a shrewd political operator after his 1984 senate election, Kerry was dogged by a troubling political myth.

He was accused of discarding his ribbons and the medals of others in 1971 to appear as an antiwar hero, while keeping his own medals for use as political props years later — a charge echoing this election year.

[. . .]

"I never ever implied that I did it," Kerry says wearily, adding: "You know what? Medals and ribbons, there's almost no difference in distinction, fundamentally. They're symbols of the same thing. They are what they are."

I don't care what Kerry did with his decorations back in 1971. I don't think you do either. I am concerned that he does not deal with this "issue" in a straightforward manner. I am also concerned about his reaction to being questioned about his inconsistent statements about the decorations. Instead of addressing the questions he launches a personal, and unsubstantiated, attack against President Bush.

More Ketchup - Version 9

Sean Hackbarth at The American Mind has posted Kerry's House of Ketchup #9. This version comes complete with sound.

Kerry's House of Ketchup is a periodic gathering of interesting John Kerry posts throughout the blogosphere. Go check it out.

Wednesday, April 28, 2004

Senator Lautenberg Is old Enough To Know Better

Today in the U.S. Senate, New Jersy's eighty-year-old Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg called Vice President Dick Cheney a "chicken hawk" for receiving four student deferments that kept him from being drafted into the military. Bloomberg reports that Lautenberg continued:

"Chicken hawks -- they shriek like a hawk, but they have the backbone of a chicken," Lautenberg, 80, said. "When it was their turn to serve, where were they? A-W-O-L, that's where."

[. . .]

"The reality is that the chicken hawks in this administration are doing a lousy job of bolstering our nation's defense and supporting the troops," he said.

Please! An eighty-year-old U.S. senator acting like a young elementary school child, reduced to calling the Vice-President of the United States names. At his age and with his experience, Lautenberg should be able to argue, debate, or campaign by engaging opponents in a meaningful discussion on important issues, instead of resorting to name calling about events which occurred more than thirty years ago.

At eighty, Lautenberg is certainly old enough to better.

I am sick and tired of having to listen to name calling about events from the sixties which have no relevance to the important issues which should be considered in this presidential campaign. I long for a meaningful debate on issues such as how best to defend the country, how to win the war against terror, education policy, and immigration reform.

UPDATE: James Joyce at Outside The Beltway addresses Lautenberg's name calling by posting:

Now, if anyone were questioning Kerry’s service in Vietnam, I suppose that would be a fair response, even though it’s still an ad hominem.
As always it is worth reading James' entire post .

Gore To Donate $6 Million to Democrats

Al Gore will donate more than $6 million to Democratic Party groups from his 2000 campaign funds.

According to the Associated Press:

The former vice president pledged to donate $4 million to the Democratic National Committee (news - web sites). The party's Senate and House committees would each get $1 million, and the party from Gore's home state of Tennessee would receive $250,000.

[. . .]

Most of the money comes from Gore's general election legal and accounting compliance fund, which showed $6.6 million on March 31. The $240,000 going to the Florida Democratic Party comes from an account established to help pay for the 2000 recount drive.

Under FEC rules, Gore could not transfer or donate the money directly to the Kerry campaign.

UPDATE: Steven Taylor, at Poliblog asks how Gore managed to have $6 million left.

Flying Saucers Invade

Reuters via ABCNEWS reports that dozens of flying saucer sightings have been reported in .

According to Reuters:

State television on Wednesday showed a sparkling white disc it said was filmed over Tehran on Tuesday night.

More colorful Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) have been spotted beaming out green, red, blue and purple rays over the northern cities of Tabriz and Ardebil and in the Caspian Sea province of Golestan, the official IRNA news agency reported.

Newspapers and agencies reported people rushing out into the streets in eight towns on Tuesday night to watch a bright extraterrestrial light dipping in and out of the clouds.

An airforce officer in the Revolutionary Guards was quoted in the reformist Vagha-ye Etefaghiyeh daily saying 's Supreme National Security Council should investigate whether these visitors from afar had hostile intent.


The head of the Astronomical Society of , told Reuters the stories were unfounded:

"In my opinion, flying saucers do not exist," he said, insisting his telescopes would have picked up invaders from outer space.

"The people who have seen these things are not experts - farmers, villagers and pilots," he added.

He said what people reported was consistent with the planet Venus, whose intense light in its current position would be given different hues by being filtered through the atmosphere.

Where is Mulder?


Birds of a Feather


Which Bob Dylan song are you?

Tangled Up In Blue

Personality Test Results

Click Here to Take This Quiz
Brought to you by YouThink.com quizzes and personality tests.

I found this quiz at Kate's Electric Venom. I got the same result as Venomous Kate.

Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Options Are Good

Connecticut's Senator Dodd is restless. The Hill reports that Dodd's political action committee — Citizens for Hope, Responsibility, Independence and Service, or CHRISPAC has raised $400,000 since last October and is expected to raise another $400,000 next month. What is Senator Dodd going to do with the money? Campaign for Senate Democratic Leader, perhaps Governor of Connecticut or maybe the White House.

According to The Hill:

But Dodd is clearly positioning himself to pursue a number of options, including mounting a bid for Daschle’s job — he lost to Daschle by only one vote in 1994 — running for governor of the Nutmeg State in 2006, or more likely running for president in 2008, assuming Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) fails to unseat President Bush this year.

Princeton Rations A's

In recent years 46 percent of grades at Princeton University have been A's.

The Associated Press reports that Princeton University's faculty approved a plan Monday to limit the number of A's awarded to undergraduates to 35 percent. For junior and senior independent work, the percentage receiving A's will be capped at 55 percent.

According to the Associated Press few students supported the change.

I'm shocked!

My Photo

Facebook

Newsvine Top News

Blogroll

Ads

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Categories

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2003