The New York Times review of "Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal" states that the documentary should be shown in its entirety on all the networks, cable stations and on public television.
The entire documentary can be seen in its entirety on the Internet for $4.99 and its audio can be downloaded online, both at www.stolenhonor.com.
UPDATE: Unlike Citizen Smash, I failed to note that this review is all the more surprising because of the Times endorsement of Kerry.
At BeldarBlog, Bill Dyer posts that the Times review is consistent with the pro-Kerry strategy of saying, in effect, "Well sure the ex-POWs are miffed, and they have understandable hard feelings about the way the American public treated them upon their return, but that's an old grudge that really doesn't have much to do with Kerry's current fitness to be President."
InTheBullPen points out that the efforts of the Democrats to suppress Stolen Honor only serves to create publicity for the documentary. That's right on and reveals the wisdom of the Times' review as explained by Beldar.
I do believe that the documentary should be shown on national TV. If journalism is meant to bring out the truth, then why don't they air the truth about Kerry? Funny how the media biases what they want the American people to see and or what they want us to know. It's disgusting when someone like Dan Rather can lie and forge documents in a effort to deceive the American people. But, as Commander of our forces and leader of this country, we need someone who has the backbone to stand for his beliefs, something Kerry does not show. Instead, he shows his lack of character as he lies and evades real issues by only critizing and blaming the current administration. If he cares so much about the issues facing America, then he should have been present to vote on them while in the senate. I hope that the American people can see Kerry's weakness as a leader and make the right choice on November 2nd.
Posted by: Agustin de la Vega | Monday, October 25, 2004 at 08:47 PM