« Afghanistan Goes to the Polls | Main | Invitation To Abuse »

Sunday, September 18, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345213db69e200d834599b7e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Afghanistan Election Update:

» AFGHAN ELECTION UPDATES from Peaktalk
Publius Pundit, Gateway Pundit, and California Yankee all have updates and link-filled posts, covering Afghanistan's first free parliamentary elections.... [Read More]

» Afghan Elections from Flopping Aces
The Afghan people are voting as we speak and I couldn't be prouder. Proud for the Afghan people who now have a voice and proud for our Country who made it happen. [Read More]

» Chimpy McHitlerburtons smirky rodeo ride through history: Sunday Election Special from protein wisdom
By all accounts, the Afghan elections went smoothly, with most emerging reports framing the proceedings positively (though the amount of coverage has been disappointing; foreign policy success stories, in our current media culture, are not near so i... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Rosemary

Great articles! I came over from Publius, because I noticed you were able to trackback. Um...if you don't mind me asking...how? lol. I'd really appreciate the learning experience.

PS. You're a California Yankee? From upstate NY, by any chance? lol. Have a great day.

Matthew Shugart

As I have said in a few posts over at Fruits & Votes, I do not think this election could have been expected to have the kind of excitement--or turnout--that we saw either in the earlier presidential election, or in the Iraqi elections (outside of the areas where the boycott was effective).

There is no sense in which national power is at stake in these Afghan elections. The president was already elected and has a fixed term, and holds the far more important office under the Afghan constitution.

Because of the electoral system being used, there is no way that voters can select a party that promises to pursue a vision for the nation or even for an ethnic or religious group, as was the case with Iraq's party-list proportional system.

Instead, voters are voting only for a single candidate among sometimes HUNDREDS running in their district, with no party affiliations listed (or sometimes known). The margin between the last few winners in a district and the first few losers will be tiny.

There really is no way voters can use a system like this to express any kind of mandate or will. All they can do is vote for some local notable. And other than the handful of "most notable" candidates in any province, most of those elected will have really tiny vote shares.

For these reasons, there just is bound to be much less perceived to be at stake than in the Afghan presidential election or the Iraqi assembly elections.

The comments to this entry are closed.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

August 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2003