Senate Democrats, along with Ohio's RINO Senator George Voinovich, continued to obstruct the nomination of John Bolton to be ambassador to the United Nations this evening, refusing to give Mr. Bolton a vote on his confirmation.
Tonight's vote to end debate and move to actual confirmation fell six votes short of the 60 required, 54 to 38.
According to the New York Times, today's vote was preceded by exchanges similar to those that have marked the Bolton nomination all along:
Mr. Bolton's supporters say his hard-charging, outspoken personality is just what is needed to shake up the United Nations, which has been embarrassed by irregularities in the Iraq oil-for-food program and other problems. Mr. Bush has challenged the organization to show that it is more than an ineffectual debating society.
Mr. Bolton's critics say that as an under secretary of state, he often bullied subordinates and tried to intimidate officials who did not agree with his views. They say, too, that he has made disparaging remarks about the United Nations that make him unfit to be Washington's envoy to the organization.
Earlier today Bloomberg reported that Arizona's Senator Kyl said Bolton may be given a recess appointment as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations if Senate Democrats continue to stall a vote on his nomination:
"It's really critical we get John Bolton confirmed," Kyl of Arizona, chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, said in an interview. "If we can't get him confirmed, my guess is he'll be appointed with a recess appointment."
A recess appointment would allow Bolton to serve as the Ambassador to the United Nations until the Congress adjourns late next year.
At a news conference today with the leaders of the European Union, President Bush refused to say whether he's considering a recess appointment. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice also wouldn't rule out a recess appointment when asked about it yesterday on Fox News Sunday.
Columnist Robert Novak says that the Democrats opposition to Bolton, led by Connecticut's Democratic Senator Dodd and newly announced presidential candidate Delaware's Senator Biden is nothing more than a political charade:
Dodd's unreported speech to an empty Senate before it adjourned for another long weekend was classic senatorial misdirection. He held out the prospect of ending the filibuster against Bolton and quickly confirming him, if only more information were given Democratic senators. Yet, in the same speech, he reiterated his unequivocal opposition to the conservative Bolton, not discussing competence or ideology but personality.
All this is a charade. Opposition to Bolton has become a party matter, where his possible Democratic supporters have been brought to heel.
[. . .]
Seeking a way to justify preconceived opposition, Dodd and Biden seized on the executive branch's refusal to give the Senate what it wanted. The issue, so obscure it is difficult for the non-senatorial mind to grasp, goes to Bolton having requested intelligence intercepts. Dodd demands the names of U.S. officials listed there whom Bolton might have intimidated.
[. . .]
This baffling process becomes intelligible only in terms that Dodd and Biden want to hold together the Democrats on grounds of senatorial prerogative in demanding information. Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat who often removes the veils from his party's strategy, conceded that this trumped-up issue unified the caucus as it had in opposing Miguel Estrada's failed judicial nomination.
President Bush will have to give Bolton a recess appointment, limiting Bolton's tenure at the United Nations to 18 months. The Democrats's successful filibuster of Bolton doesn't bode well for President Bush in the almost certain battle to come over a Supreme Court nomination.
Recent Comments